Recent Postings
Aug 31 IT BHU Chronicle: August '08 edition
Aug 30 Sad demise of Mr. Madan Mohan Tiwari (Electronics 1973)
Aug 28 Tesla hires Deepak Ahuja (Ceramic 1985) away from Ford to serve as CFO
Aug 28 Mata Prasad (Electrical 1954) - an expert in electrical protection systems
Aug 28 Satish Agarwal (Mechanical 1970) Chairman of Kamdhenu Ispat Pvt. Lyd.
Aug 28 Dr. Sandeep Gupta (B. Pharm 1982 & M. Pharm 1984) joins as Senior VP for Endo Pharmaceuticals
Recent Comments
Archives
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
Movable Type 4.1
July 17, 2007
Funding for universities
Arun @ Jul 17, 2007

Link

Need-based funds for universities on cards

CHARU SUDAN KASTURI

sharedpurse.JPG

New Delhi, June 30: Universities may now receive funds based on their actual needs rather than the whims of education officials.
The University Grants Commission (UGC), which funds central institutions of higher learning, plans an institute where researchers will assess the requirements of universities.

The UGC has frequently faced allegations of being “unable to explain” why certain universities receive less money per student than others (see chart). Delhi University, which has more students than any other, has long complained of “stepmotherly treatment”.

“If things go according to plan, there will no longer be any scope for allegations of favouritism. The funds allocation will be explained by the evaluation of the researchers,” a UGC official said.

The Planning Commission has cleared the proposal for the Higher Education Institute for Research, Policy and Programme, to which professionally trained researchers will be recruited. It is likely to be set up and start providing its estimates in a couple of years.

UGC funding falls in two categories: recurring, which is provided annually, and a one-time non-recurring grant for improving infrastructure.

The non-recurring grant, therefore, varies from one university to another. For instance, an engineering or medical college needs laboratories, which a college teaching only humanities does not.

The competition for funds has largely been about the recurring grants. Institutions such as DU and the Shillong-based North Eastern Hill University (Nehu) argue that the figure per student should be the same for every university. (The figures in the chart have been arrived at by dividing the recurring funds the universities have been receiving by their number of students.)

“The UGC has repeatedly been unable to explain to us why we receive such paltry funding in the recurring category compared with other central universities,” a senior DU official complained.

The reservation oversight committee headed by Congress MP Veerappa Moily, too, had discussed the problems universities face because of what one vice-chancellor has described as “completely irrational funding”.

While Banaras Hindu University receives around Rs 2.4 lakh a year per student, the figure is Rs 67,000 for DU. Nehu, which the UGC has marked as a “university with potential”, receives only Rs 14,000 per student. BHU, UGC officials say, receives more money than others because of its large engineering section.

The IITs and the IIMs receive less per student in the recurring category than BHU, largely because they also receive significant funding from other sources, such as strong alumni associations and tie-ups with private companies.

While the IITs receive Rs 1.85 lakh per student, the figure is Rs 1.5 lakh for the IIMs.

The Higher Education Institute for Research, Policy, and Programme will also evaluate the implementation of UGC programmes in universities and colleges.