Recent Postings
Aug 31 IT BHU Chronicle: August '08 edition
Aug 30 Sad demise of Mr. Madan Mohan Tiwari (Electronics 1973)
Aug 28 Tesla hires Deepak Ahuja (Ceramic 1985) away from Ford to serve as CFO
Aug 28 Mata Prasad (Electrical 1954) - an expert in electrical protection systems
Aug 28 Satish Agarwal (Mechanical 1970) Chairman of Kamdhenu Ispat Pvt. Lyd.
Aug 28 Dr. Sandeep Gupta (B. Pharm 1982 & M. Pharm 1984) joins as Senior VP for Endo Pharmaceuticals
Recent Comments
Archives
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
Movable Type 4.1
August 20, 2007
Supreme Court rules against OBC quota
Chronicle Editor @ Aug 20, 2007

SC refuses to vacate stay on OBC quota
8 Aug 2007, 1042 hrs IST , PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution Bench on Wednesday refused to lift stay on the implementation of 27 per cent quota for OBCs in elite educational institutions.

"We are not going to pass any interim order," a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan said.

The Bench said it will hear the main petition to examine the Constitutional validity of the Centre Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act 2006.

Last week, a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan had said that it would be proper to place the Centre's application seeking vacation of stay on OBC quota before the Constitution Bench, which would hear the PILs challenging the validity of laws permitting 27% OBC quota.

The main argument of the Centre in seeking vacation of stay after its first unsuccessful attempt was the apex court's order allowing Tamil Nadu to increase the seats in institutions to accommodate 69% reservation for backward classes. It had said CEIs (Reservation in Admissions) Act, 2006, envisaged the same situation - increase in the number of seats so that seats meant for general category were not reduced.

However, the government did not point out that the apex court allowed the 69% reservation to continue with increase in seats as the Tamil Nadu reservation law had been put in the ninth schedule, barring the apex court from scrutinising the legality of the legislation.

(Chronicle Note: The above information is provided as a published news item. Chronicle has no position about reservation.)